Do you look for images online to use for your projects? Do you have your own graphics or photos online? What are the rules for using these images? What can you do if someone steals your image? How can you prevent it? If you create or use artwork in any form for any purpose, you need to read this!
I was originally going to start a post on a different topic last Friday, but when I sat down that morning at my computer to look up something online, I found an eBook that was using one of the coloring pages I posted on this blog as the cover of their book! I spent the day trying to figure out how to report it, looking to see where else this image and some of my others may have been used, and researching my legal options. It is all a bit overwhelming!
Even if you are not an author or artist, you can have your articles or photos stolen from your blog, your Instagram account, or your Facebook page. Do you know how to protect your stuff?
If you are a blogger or create web sites, you may be looking for photos or graphics to use on your web site. Or maybe you are a crafter and are looking for images to use in one of your crafts. Do you know what images you can legally use?
I decided to dedicate this article to educating everyone about copyright laws and how they apply to the images you find on the internet (or elsewhere). If you create or use artwork in any form for any purpose, you need to read this!
This turned out to be such a huge topic, that I’ve split the article into two posts. I’ve also included a table of contents here. After reading this post, read Part 2: Preventing, detecting, and stopping copyright violations.
When an author writes (whether a novel, poem, magazine article, or blog post), a musician records, a photographer photographs, or an artist paints or sculpts or draws (by hand or via computer), they are creating a “tangible” work that they own the rights to. They immediately own the copyright, whether or not they register it or even put the copyright symbol on that work. If you do see a copyright notice, it is usually in the form of “© 2015 Disney. All rights reserved.”
Copyright protection grants artists exclusive rights to:
- make copies of the work
- make derivative works
- distribute the work
- display the work
When you see “All rights reserved” that means that they reserve (i.e., they control or own) all of these rights listed above.
When an artist publishes that work in a book or displays it on the internet, the copyright still holds, unless the artist grants rights to someone else to use that work. So, for example, if I post a copy of a drawing I just finished to my Facebook page saying “Phew! I finally finished this one!” then I am not granting any rights to anyone to use that image in any way. Just because I put it out for view doesn’t mean you can use it.
So, in other words, the author/artist is the only one allowed to do anything with that work, unless they give permission otherwise. [There are a few exceptions discussed below.]
What a lot of people don’t realize is that, with few exceptions, using an image is a copyright violation unless you are specifically granted permission, not the other way around! People think that if they find an image on Pinterest or Google or anywhere online for that matter that it means it is fair game to use, whether they plan to sell it or not. Not so! And it doesn’t matter if you see a copyright on it or not.
A good analogy comes from the music industry. I think most people know that it is illegal to download or make copies of music that you haven’t paid for. Many will do it anyway, though, thinking that since they aren’t reselling it, it must be okay, or at least they won’t get caught. The music industry has spent millions trying to stop pirated music. Because it costs them millions in lost revenue. And how is this fair to the singers and musicians and songwriters? Shouldn’t they get paid for their work?
Now think about the artists and photographers and bloggers. Those of us in this for our careers or for making extra income put our images out there to get our names known, to advertise our works, to attract people to our blogs — all with the intent of selling our works or making money indirectly via advertising on our blogs, just as musicians record their music and play it in concerts or on the radio to try to get you to buy their CDs. Even if I grant you permission to download a free coloring page for personal use, I am not granting you permission to make copies for your buddies, or put it on your web site for others to download. I know you aren’t selling it, but I am not getting traffic to my website. This, in turn, means that my stats are lower, which means my advertising revenue goes down. I also don’t get the feedback to see which of my works are more popular, to know where to direct future efforts.
As I mentioned, there are a few exceptions. First, some works are considered part of the “public domain.” Public domain is not just anything found on the internet. Public domain only includes works never covered by copyright or ones with expired copyright. Anything published before 1923 is public domain. Unpublished works are under copyright protection for at least the life of the author plus 70 years. Works published between 1923 and 2002 are trickier and may be free to use, depending on whether they were published with a copyright notice and whether or not that copyright has been renewed. Also note that works of the U.S. government are excluded from copyright protection (i.e., they are public domain). There is a useful tool provided by the American Library Association to help determine copyright protection.
There is also something called “fair use,” which allows for limited use of portions of a work for certain circumstances. For example, if you write a school paper you may take quotes from a book. You are allowed to use excerpts (or images) for reviews, public service, parodies, and educational purposes. Guidelines about fair use are not very specific, and left to the interpretation of the courts. But, for example, if you are writing a review of Chameleon pens, you should be safe taking a promotional image from their web site to use in your article to show the product that is the subject of your review. Or if you are providing a how-to article on using a Cricut machine for a scrapbooking project, it would be considered fair use to use one of the manufacturer’s promotional images of that machine. Another example would be reviewing a coloring book. You may show the promotional image of the book cover and a limited portion of that book in your review. Note, however, that if you show an entire page from the book in high quality or such that someone could then take to copy and use as an actual coloring page (whether you get this image from the book’s promo site, you scan it, or photograph it), this would likely be considered a copyright violation.
If you see a copyright notice or otherwise do not see permission to use the image, you should contact the owner to see if they will grant you permission.
If you own the copyright to a piece, you may choose to grant full or partial rights to others. For example, McDonald’s licensed Disney Pixar Minion characters for Happy Meals. That means that McDonald’s had a contract with Disney whereby they worked out a deal for McDonald’s to pay Disney to be able to use specific Minion characters on specific toys, Happy Meal boxes, or ads, for a specific amount of time. But McDonald’s can’t just start using any Disney character or using Minions on any product. The contract didn’t grant exclusive rights either, which means Disney could also license the Minion characters to Target for bedding sets.
Usually, if you grant permission for others to use your work for monetary compensation, you set up a royalty licensing agreement. Maybe you create a design that Hallmark wants to put on a card. You might structure the deal so that you receive a percentage of all sales for that card. There is usually a time-limit on a deal (e.g., 1 year). You may decide whether to grant exclusive rights or nonexclusive. The topic of art licensing is huge and deserves a whole series just for it so I won’t go into any other details here (maybe someday I’ll cover it).
You may sign your rights over completely as well. For example, you may sell your card design to Hallmark outright for a hefty one-time fee. This means that Hallmark now holds the copyright, not you. This isn’t too common unless someone is desperate for money ASAP.
You may grant rights “for personal use only” meaning you will let someone use this for their own enjoyment, but they may not transfer those rights to anyone else. In other words, I’m letting you download my coloring page to color, but you can’t give a copy to someone else. You can’t post it online. You can’t sell it, or use any part of it to make something to sell. For example, you can’t put the image on a mug or greeting card that you then sell.
You may grant permission to another blogger to use your images (or just one or a limited set of images) in an article they are writing, provided they give you proper credit and link back to your site. You may also stipulate whether they can or must use the image directly from your site or can or must take a copy of your image to host on their site (depending on their site’s traffic and your site’s bandwidth, if you have limits). You may also state a specific maximum size, or limits on modifying the image (e.g., if it must be taken in entirety or can they crop or recolor it). You may also limit where it can be used (e.g., anywhere on their site or just within one article, anywhere in the article but not the thumbnail or promotional material, etc.).
You may want to use a Creative Commons license. The Creative Commons organization created a set of standard public copyright licenses authors and artists can use to grant rights to the public for full or restricted use. There are several flavors to choose from, based on what rights you would like to grant. The CC licenses are common in the software development community and are gaining popularity in the art community.
Many bloggers will often break the rules and use the image without permission, trying to be good by linking back to the source, invoking the “do first, ask forgiveness later” policy. It’s often not out of malice. It’s often a time issue, e.g., trying to get that recipe post out on time when you discover your photos didn’t come out. A blogger with a conscience will at least put a link and give credit to the source. And in this case, most people who have been violated will forgive, because they are usually looking for backlinks to their site anyway. A not so conscientious blogger may not give credit, and in fact, try to claim that image as their own.
In either case, they may think they won’t get caught. With all of the web sites out there, what are the odds the original owner would ever find out? Well, there are some tools that make this a little riskier than maybe in the past. There are image search tools that put more control back in the hands of the artist. [I discuss some of these tools in the next post.]
Even if you buy the image (e.g., you buy a coloring book or buy a stock photo online), you cannot then assume you have rights to do whatever you want. Many authors will put explicit statements in the copyright notice in their book explaining what permissions they are releasing to use. If you buy stock photos, make sure to read the licensing terms. Some stock photography licenses allow an image to be used on your web site, but you can’t start selling prints of those photos. Read the fine print.
One of the rights listed for the copyright owner is to “make derivative works.” What is this? That means taking the original work and transforming it, whether making a novel into a movie, a cartoon character into a doll, or photo into a drawing. It also covers making a collage, using a rubber stamp, or coloring a coloring page. But you are allowed to be “inspired” by an image. So where do you draw the line? This is one of the trickiest areas of the copyright law because it is so open to interpretation. Here are some common scenarios for artists and crafters.
Scenario 1: You see a photo of a cute dog. You decide you want to draw that dog. Can you legally do this? First of all, see if the photo is copyrighted or if the artist has granted rights to use it. Next, are you using this photo just as inspiration and technical reference (e.g., to get the dog’s proportions right), or are you copying the photo? Would your drawing be recognizable as a copy of the photo? This can be a very tricky area, and the courts are not always consistent in their rulings in these cases. Drawing the dog in the same exact pose but just a different background would not be enough of a change. Drawing that same dog running instead of sitting would be okay. A good rule of thumb is, if you are questioning whether it’s okay, it probably is not okay. Contact the photographer and they will likely allow it. Or use multiple photographs and take inspiration from each of them. And don’t use a famous photograph or painting as your subject that would be easily recognized as being from that artist. For example, millions of people have taken photos of the Grand Canyon. You’ll likely find many of those taken from the same vantage point under the same lighting conditions, so they essentially look the same. So if you used one of these as the basis for your drawing, it would be very difficult for a photographer to prove that you used their photo as the basis of your drawing.
Scenario 2: You buy a coloring book. You color the images, remove them from the book, frame them, and want to sell them. Is this okay? The answer is (probably) no, unless the copyright notice in the book explicitly grants you the rights. The act of coloring them makes them a derivative work (according to most sources). Oddly enough, if you didn’t color them and just left them untouched and framed them, you actually would have a right to do this. This is covered under the “first sale doctrine” where if you buy a book you have a right to resell that book. You could only sell the original pages from the book and not copies of those pages, though. [Note that there is conflicting information out there about the colored pages scenario. Some say the colored work IS covered under the first sale doctrine and not considered a derivative work, while others say it is a derivative work and NOT covered. Even the courts cannot seem to agree on what “derivative work” really means in all scenarios (based on wording of Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 101). If you are considering doing this, I would obtain legal counsel for advice.]
Scenario 3: You want to make polymer clay necklaces to sell. You buy a mold of a pretty little frame to use and you put in it an image you made using a purchased rubber stamp on some clay and then painted it, so it looks like you have a pretty little painting in a frame on a bale. You also used a purchased texture plate to make the painting look like it is on canvas. Is this okay? The answer is no, unless you check with the manufacturer of the frame mold and the manufacturers of the rubber stamp and the texture plate! If the image is of a recognizable character like Hello Kitty or a Minion, that answer would most certainly be no (they are sold for personal use only, usually). The texture plate and frame mold would likely be licensed for commercial use. The rubber stamp may just allow for personal use only. So, check, check, check.
Some artists and photographers grant permission to use their work to create other works of art which you may then sell. If not stated, however, it means you do not have those rights. A good rule of thumb here is, if you want to sell anything you make, it is best to either make it all from scratch, or do the leg work to see if you can use those materials to make works for sale.
This is a very specific scenario that won’t apply to all of you, but I wanted to include it for completeness. When someone is hired as an employee to create artwork for their company, the company holds the copyright. But when someone is hired to create artwork that is not an employee, the copyright ownership needs to be thoroughly spelled out in the contract. Unless otherwise stated, the artist retains the copyright even after artwork and money has changed hands. The hiring company simply has a non-exclusive license to use the work. It is important that the contract spell out who will hold the copyright, and also under what conditions the copyright will change hands (e.g., at time of full payment). Most work-for-hire contract templates will including a section for this.
Now we know what copyright is, when it applies, and how to determine how an image can be used. What if someone steals your work? How do you find out? Can it be prevented? What recourse do you have? And if you find you are in violation, what could happen?
We’ll discuss these topics in the next post.
- See Part 2 for the list of references used for this article.